[OPE] Labour

From: McDonough, Terrence <terrence.mcdonough@nuigalway.ie>
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 21:01:04 EST

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:57:51 +0100
From: GERALD LEVY <gerald_a_levy@msn.com>
Subject: RE: [OPE] labour
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Message-ID: <BLU142-W2522C7A7F3C22BF5C9CBB0BBFB0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> Isn't it possible for 'simple undifferentiated expenditure of human energy' to be > a condition of existence for markets Why, Terry?

In solidarity, Jerry
> and simultaneously for markets to be a condition of existence for 'simple > undifferentiated expenditure of human energy'.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/private/ope/attachments/20081210/0661a7f2/attachment-0001.html

Perhaps because only this allows for the impersonal exchange of equivalents. But my point was more hypothetical - that two things can be conditions for each other without either being prior to the other in either time or causality.
ope mailing list
Received on Wed Dec 10 21:06:05 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2008 - 00:00:05 EST