[OPE-L] The Antichrist

From: Jurriaan Bendien (adsl675281@TISCALI.NL)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2007 - 12:11:18 EDT

Jerry I don't know why you bother with this. If Kliman wants to play
anti-Christ, let him then, who cares (as long as he doesn't get in the way).

Actually, even an Amazon reviewer (not among Kliman's self-endorsements)
picks up what's wrong with the dreaded duo's spiel:

"The one downside of this book, as with every book by Kliman and/or Freeman,
is the pointless invective aimed at their opponents and the almost paranoid
tone in which the lack of positive reception on the part of Kliman et al. is
discussed. Even respected Marxist colleagues, who probably agree politically
and scientifically with Kliman on 99.9% of all issues, are constantly
portrayed as ignorant at best and malevolent and intellectually dishonest at
worst, without any proof for this at all."
I guess I shouldn't have started a TSSI article on wikipedia. It is like
waving a red rag to a bull, and then you spend a long time trying to kill
the bull. But what is bad is that Kliman starts to hack into the article
about David Laibman, instead of writing an article about himself and his own
pet hates.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 00:00:17 EDT