From: Andrew Brown (A.Brown@LUBS.LEEDS.AC.UK)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 10:39:33 EDT
Btw Paul, You are right about machine / machine power, of course. The relevant parallel I wanted to make is between machine-power / machine contribution, on the one hand, and labour-power / labour, on the other. For some reason I often make that mistake. Andy ------------ Paul the correspondence should not be machine/machine power to labour/labour power. If one wants to do that the correspondance should be (machine/machine power) goes to (worker/labour power).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 26 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT