Re: [OPE-L] James Furner's paper in Historical Materialism

From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 14:07:51 EST

I didn't understand Furner either.  I don't understand how his reading of Bailey connects to systemic dialectics, which he claims.   On his reading of Kliman on intrinsic value, I couldn't comprehend Furner (top of p. 96); I went back to Kliman's text and I just don't see how Furner got his reading.

I wrote Furner mid-Jan. but got no response.

Paul Z.

Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science

"Hans G. Ehrbar" <ehrbar@LISTS.ECON.UTAH.EDU> said, on 03/01/05:

> But when I
>tried to follow James's argument I realized that James's
>reading of Marx is so different from my own that I would not
>be able to use much of his thinking in my work, therefore I
>gave up.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 07 2005 - 00:00:01 EST