[ show plain text ]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Paul Cockshott
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:47 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [OPE-L:3299] Re: objectivity of value
>Paul C writes:
> This is a point where we part company, I would go along with Ajit
> in saying
> that the objective measure of value is labour time. This exists prior to
> sale as a
> property of the input/output matrix.
And Michael W. asks:
And what if no input-output matrix has been constructed?
> If one takes the opposite position whereby value only exists
> after it has been
> measured as price, you are philosophically on the ground of neo-classical
> subjectivist economics.
Can you justify this? Afer all, under competition all agents are assumed to
"What is matter? - Never mind. What is mind? - No matter."
Dr Michael Williams
Economics and Social Sciences
De Montfort University
tel: +1908 834876
[Home: +1703 768641]
fax: 0870 133 1147
[This message may be in html, and any attachments may be in MSWord 2000. If
you have difficulty reading either, please let me know.]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EDT