[OPE-L:1898] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the money supply

Subject: [OPE-L:1898] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the money supply
From: Duncan K. Foley (foleyd@cepa.newschool.edu)
Date: Sat Dec 11 1999 - 22:16:36 EST

The State might be able to force the coins to circulate using police power,
but can it enforce their value?


>Addendum on a point I missed. Claus wrote:
>> This is why the state, which mints the coins, can profit -
>> and always has - from minting debased coins, as long as
>> people don't notice the fact, i.e., the state falsely
>> certifies that a coin has the amount of the commodity money
>> stated by the law.
>Whether or not people notice is beside the point. The point is
>that the state has a well-enforced legal monopoly on the
>production of money. If the face value of coin exceeds its
>metallic value private agents have an _incentive_ to mint coins
>themselves, but if they do so they'll go to prison. (Ricardo
>was quite clear that the devaluation of coin has always fallen
>well short of its debasement.) Why? The state monopoly on
>money is not arbitrary; it is a corollary of the fact that money
>is the means of discharging one's tax liability to the state,
>and if that is too easily discharged the state is in trouble.
>This simple fact is "invisible" if one attempts to derive money
>as a "natural" outgrowth of free exchange of commodities.
>Allin Cottrell.

Duncan K. Foley
Department of Economics
Graduate Faculty
New School University
65 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
messages: (212)-229-5717
fax: (212)-229-5724
e-mail: foleyd@cepa.newschool.edu
alternate: foleyd@newschool.edu
webpage: http://cepa.newschool.edu/~foleyd

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Sun Dec 12 1999 - 15:45:04 EST