David Laibman (SCSJJ@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU)
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:16:17 EDT
Thnx for the clarification. My memory may have been faulty
concerning whether Kenneth actually sent us a review, and our
files don't go back far enough for me to check that. He will
know, of course. But I think I am right in remembering that
the review was accepted for publication, subject to some
revisions which Kenneth himself seemed to agree with. What I
meant is not that we never received a review, but that the
revised version never came in; if it
had, we surely would have published it.
But my preference is to focus on the substantive issues,
rather than on details of editorial history.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Jan 03 2000 - 12:18:34 EST