[OPE-L:1922] Re: Fred's OPE-1850

akliman@acl.nyit.edu (akliman@acl.nyit.edu)
Tue, 23 Apr 1996 17:06:57 -0700

[ show plain text ]

I still owe Fred my own reply to his ope-l 1850. But I just wanted to
indicate that Alan Freeman's interpretation of the Kliman and McGlone
interpretation of the transformation is "correct," i.e., what we

On first reading (at least), I concur with the other aspects of Alan's
reply to Fred as well.

The key point, for now, is that, like Fred, we agree that the surplus-
value is fully and completely transformed in a single period, and
(in all illustrations of the transformation we've presented) depict it
as such.

More to come

Andrew Kliman