RE: [OPE] Specially for Patrick Bond: David Harvey on equilibrium

Date: Thu Sep 17 2009 - 06:36:38 EDT

> How can there be disequilibrium without equilibrium?

You missed - or don't want to hear - my point. The point is
that the concept of disequilibrium presupposes a concept of
equilibrium. You can't have the latter concept without the
Simple Unity: Equilibrium
Difference: Disequilibrium
Unity-in-Difference: (what is often called) Disequilibrium dynamics
The fact that this relation is often not appreciated by some
Marxists who claim to present dynamic, non-equilibrium theory
shows the quasi-dynamic and relatively undeveloped character of
their theoretical perspective.
In solidarity, Jerry _______________________________________________
ope mailing list
Received on Thu Sep 17 06:39:20 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 30 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT