[OPE] Mark to market: now you see it, now you don't

From: Jurriaan Bendien <adsl675281@telfort.nl>
Date: Wed Mar 18 2009 - 13:33:32 EDT

(from James Saft, "Accounting won't save banking", Reuters, March 13, 2009)

The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, led by Congressman Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania today is holding a hearing on mark-to-market and already the industry knives are out. A group of 31 industry groups and financial institutions, including the American Bankers Association, Mortgage Bankers Association and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have petitioned the committee to take "immediate action" to stop the "spiral of accounting-driven financial losses," according to the Los Angeles Times.

They argue that current rules, which force banks to carry some securities on their books at levels that reflect current market prices, mean they have to recognize losses that "do not have a basis in economic reality". That's as may be, but so far market prices have arguably been a better directional indicator of the future performance of collateral than some hopeful internally generated marks. Is mark-to-market perfect? No. Might reform, in the fullness of time, adjust some of its pro-cyclical effects? Yes. Will doing that in the midst of a crisis have the desired effect? No.

This whole effort fundamentally misunderstands the situation facing banking. The problem facing the banking industry is not just solvency on some accounting or regulatory basis, it is solvency on, for want of a better phrase, a solvency basis. Thus banks are unwilling to do business with one another and investors unwilling to lend banks money or invest in them. They do not reliably know who is bust and who is not. http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/03/13/accounting-change-wont-save-banking/

ope mailing list
Received on Wed Mar 18 13:36:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 31 2009 - 00:00:03 EDT