RE: [OPE] Venezuela and the right-wing opponents of democracy

Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 09:39:17 EDT

> Venezuela doesn’t have a dictatorship… yet.

Hi Alejandro:

Then you shouldn't use expressions like "left-wing dictatorship".
should you?

I agree that it is legitimate to fear the coming of a dictatorship
in Venezuela - after all, wasn't it just last week that 'opposition'
military officers were caught planning the assassination of Chavez?
Then, there was the experience of the 2002 coup which - had it
been successful - would have _surely_ brought into power a brutal

In the presence of such threats (not merely to Chavez and the Bolivarians
but to the nation - especially the working class and the poor) one has to be
on-guard, vigilent, and resolute.

If there is a failing of Chave in this regard, it is that he has been _too_
accomodating to the opposition - in the name of 'forgiveness' and
national reconciliation.

It might help if a proposal made by Marx and Engels in _The
Communist Manifesto_ was made the official policy in Venezuela:

"confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels".

 _Surely_, you would agree with that policy as a deterrant? Yes?

> But it certainly stops to fully fulfill the minimal elements that define
> an electoral democracy: 1) right to vote, 2) fair elections, 3) free elections
> and 4) elected public offices. When does Venezuela stop to fulfill these
> requirements?

Even Jimmy Carter said the elections were fair and free, didn't he?

All of the chatter about lack of democracy is disingenuous, imo:
had the opposition won the election, _then_ they would have said
it was fair, but they denounced it as 'undemocratic' _simply_ because
they lost. _Please_ understand this - the opposition is _not_ democratic!
They want to _overthrow_ democracy!!! This was _proven_ in the 2002
coup and in their actions (including, illegal plots) since.

> This minimal definition of “electoral democracy” has to be the departure for
> Socialists, and build upon it more complex models of economic democracy.

The "minimal definition" of democracy for socialists must be majority rule.
This means (since they are the overwhelming majority) that the working
class and the poor must rule.

In solidarity, Jerry
ope mailing list
Received on Thu Sep 25 09:41:20 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:12:31 EST