RE: [OPE] The Dog Days of August?

Date: Sat Aug 16 2008 - 08:39:35 EDT

Hi Dave:
A point made by Paul Z in the video bears repeating: there WAS a 
conspiracy. That is not in doubt.  There is an official US State 
Department version of what the conspiracy was and who was 
responsible and there are alternative theories which suggest other
forms of conspiracy and present evidence in support of their hypotheses. 
The question concerns WHICH conspiracy theory holds up better against 
the criteria you identified. In my opinion, the "official" conspiracy theory 
has been scrutinized, shredded to bits, and has NO credibility. What then 
is "the truth"? I don't know - other than it's NOT what the state and the
media have asserted.
In solidarity, Jerry
> The mass of evidence for extraordinary and implausible (by the standards > of Occam and his razor) claims have to significantly *outweigh and > contradict* the simpler and widely accepted general account. This is not > the case for the 911 conspiracy theories today. (The Griffin interview > being a perfect example.)

ope mailing list

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 00:00:07 EDT