RE: [OPE] Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela internal ballot.

From: Paul Cockshott (
Date: Mon Mar 10 2008 - 18:41:49 EDT

I think that this process that Gerry describes perfectly sumarises the undemocratic
nature of pyramidal elections. No system is more suited to dominance by a party elite
than this. The 'democracy' here is no more than it is in all electoral systems, a
means of legitimising an elite. Here we see the same process that created the party
state of the Bolesheviks.

Paul Cockshott
Dept of Computing Science
University of Glasgow
+44 141 330 1629

-----Original Message-----
From: on behalf of GERALD LEVY
Sent: Mon 3/10/2008 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [OPE] Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela internal ballot.
Alejandro A:
I question the meaning that you attach to the numbers. 
Who are the 87,000 people who chose the provisional executive?
Aren't they, if I recall correctly, composed of 7 _elected_ people from 
each of around 12,000 battalions? (NB: the 5 million member figure 
for party membership was never a serious # and certainly doesn't 
represent 'registered party members'.)
Where did the 69 names come from? If I understood the process
correctly,  everyone of the 1600 congress delegates proposed 3 names - 
hopefully, in consultation with battalion members. Of course, many of 
the delegates proposed many of the same names - especially the better 
known and respected Bolivarians. Nothing wrong with that. 
None of this sounds undemocratic, especially recalling that there will 
be general elections for public offices in which candidates from other 
parties and individuals who don't belong to or represent parties will 
In solidarity, Jerry

ope mailing list

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2008 - 00:00:14 EDT