Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values

From: Jerry Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Mon Mar 19 2007 - 14:25:21 EDT

> That is, a stash of "money to be advanced" can be said to exist
> _prior_ to production only (a) at the micro level of individual
> firms (perhaps!) or (b) in a fictional economy on a synchronized
> annual agricultural cycle.

Hi Allin and others:

I think this issue arises in Fred's perspective because he takes the
analysis of Volume 1 and capital-in-general to concern the
macroeconomy.  Suppose instead that the issue of  where the
initial M comes from and what its quantity is in the formula
M - C - M'  comes up in the context of what modern economists
call a "representative firm".   In more Hegelian language,  it might be
thought of as  a capitalist firm in the context of simple, undifferentiated
unity.  This isn't exactly a real firm because it is presented at a stage
when competition has not yet been posited. If this were the case, then
the macro issue in terms of stipulating the initial quantity of M doesn't
come up: one could plug in _any_ number so long as a) the number is
assumed to be sufficient to purchase C (MP, LP) and b) so long as
M' is larger than M.  The issue, after all, for Marx wasn't  what the
quantity of M in the beginning of the formula is; the issue was what is
the source of delta M at the end of the formula.

The micro/macro distinction that we're all familiar with doesn't work
very well in terms of  interpreting Marx's theory, imo.

In solidarity, Jerry

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 31 2007 - 01:00:12 EDT