Re: [OPE-L] Ajit's Paper on Sraffa and Late Wittgenstein

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2006 - 04:22:27 EDT

>You are still wrong, as Cutler et al are. Your problem
>is that you try to understand classics through second
>hand mediocreties.

You're right, Ajit!  I should not count on your interpretation
of classic texts.

At any rate, do you mean that no Sraffian has ever stooped to actually
write a reply to their critique, probably written
by Athar Hussain. Why bother to engage
such a well known mediocrity?

>Your understanding of Marx is also
>second hand,

I didn't know that. I shall stop reading him
as you obviously did a few pages before the
the end of the first, putatively Walrasian part of Capital.


>  and again through the works of
>mediocreties. ajit sinha

>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 00:00:03 EDT