Re: [OPE-L] is there "no longer a single dominant school" in economics?

From: Paul Cockshott (wpc@DCS.GLA.AC.UK)
Date: Tue Sep 13 2005 - 10:30:20 EDT

Riccardo wrote



yes, I am interested - btw, I strongly disagree both with the new
pluralism and with the turn taken by Bowles et al. They are following
the "imperfectionist" line descending from the EEG as the base of
economics. I am for a dialogue and criticism of the heterodox monetary
analysis within a Marxian perspective. I liked very much the other two


What do you mean by the EEG

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 14 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT