Re: on money

From: Paul C (clyder@GN.APC.ORG)
Date: Sat May 29 2004 - 16:45:19 EDT

Paul Zarembka wrote:

>The first use of the word Value in Volume 1 comes right after describing
>labor in the abstract.  So where do you find in Marx that Value goes
>beyond a context of labor in the abstract (is indepedent of the
>commoditization of labor power, thus buying and selling of labor power
>which he will discuss a bit later)?
 There is a shift here in your presentation from abstract labour to the
buying and selling
of labour power. If the distinction between labour and labour power
means anything,
your equation can surely not be retained.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 30 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT