Re: on money

From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 08:21:15 EDT


In your interpretation 'value' is independent of the buying and selling of
labor power, independent of the capitalist mode of production, and exists
in C-M-C, simple commodity exchange?


Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science

On Mon, 24 May 2004, Howard Engelskirchen wrote:

> ....  But for Marx,
> value is not something a commodity has; value constitutes a commodity.
> If a product of labor doesn't have value, then it is not a commodity.
> Value constitutes what a commodity is.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 00:00:02 EDT