Re: (OPE-L) Re: accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?

From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:46:22 EDT


You didn't copy the whole of what you had asked me. Anyway, are you
prepared to delimit the question to constant c/(v+s) -- I should rephrase
"abstracting from changes in c/(v+s)" -- or is this to be a _beginning_
(your word) for including changes in c/(v+s) and in s/v?

If the latter we can go anywhere and everywhere and I'm not up to it.

Sorry, Paul

Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote:

> > Your answer leaves the field wide open for any all responses, no
> > delimitation of the issues at hand.
> Hi Paul Z:
> I don't see how the following response "leaves the field wide open for
> any [and] all responses", but if you don't have the time, you don't have
> the time.
> In solidarity, Jerry
> >> Can I answer you using c/(v+s), which avoid the
> >> distributional qustion?
> > I want clarification and dialogue so, sure,  I don't mind if you
> > _begin_ by answering the question you would have preferred
> > that I ask provided you then attempt to answer the question that I did
> > ask, OK?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 23 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT