From: Phil Dunn (pscumnud@DIRCON.CO.UK)
Date: Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:41:03 EST
>Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:19:55 +0000 >To: OPE-L <OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU> >From: Phil Dunn <email@example.com> >Subject: Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ? >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > >>"I do not agree with either the orthodox theory or >>Screpanti's, but that is irrelevant. It is the charge >>of incoherence that -I would guess- would attract the >>'Damned Lies' bit." >> >>Oh! I had not seen this one and I'm not sure who wrote >>this. It could well be a good joke. Coherence is the >>last thing one can find in the TSS approach to Marx or >>for that matter anything. It is laughable that the >>author of the above quote thinks that such a mild >>criticism of an approach deserves to be called "dammed >>lies". I think the TSS is not only incoherent but >>simply nonsensical! ajit sinha I am not sure who wrote this but if it is the same person who wrote: I think the only way to intelectually deal with TSS folks is to completely ignore them--otherwise it will be nothing but simple waste of energy then he is not following his own precept. A case of internal inconsistency, perhaps.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 25 2004 - 00:00:02 EST