From: Rakesh Bhandari (rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU)
Date: Fri Jun 13 2003 - 02:14:00 EDT
> >OK, explain your structure--- once we have proceeded (as Marx >intended after CAPITAL) to relax the assumption that the standard of >necessity (ie., the use-values entering into the value of >labour-power) is given. > > in solidarity, > Michael L Michael, I forgot to mention that Howard Botwinick has provided a structural explanation for persistent wage differences; I think Michael Yates reviewed the book in Monthly Review a few years back, and former OPE-L'er Patrick Mason has of course developed similar ideas. Yours, Rakesh Persistent Inequalities by Howard Botwinick Product Details * Hardcover: 324 pages ; Dimensions (in inches): 1.50 x 6.75 x 9.75 * Publisher: Princeton Univ Pr; (July 26, 1993) * ASIN: 0691042977 Editorial Reviews Book Description Up to now, most radical, as well as neoclassical, economists have assumed that significant wage differentials among workers of similar skill and ability will endure only when competition in the capital and/or labor market is seriously restricted. In contrast, this work uses a classical Marxist analysis of real capitalist competition to show that substantial patterns of wage disparity can persist despite high levels of competition and significant degrees of labor mobility. Indeed, Howard Botwinick argues in this provocative work that capitalist competition often militates against the equalization of wage rates. An analytical strength of this new approach is that critical institutionalist insights concerning the impact of unions and industry structure can now be rigorously incorporated within a highly competitive framework. Thus, this book provides unorthodox economists with a robust alternative to efficiency wage theories, which are once again suggesting that unions have little long-term effect on the inter- industry wage structure. In addition to providing the basis for a new explanation for the persistence of race and gender inequality, the work has important implications for effective trade union strategies in an increasingly competitive environment. Contrary to corporate calls for team production systems and other forms of labor-management cooperation, Botwinick argues that labor's most effective strategy is to build wider levels of militant union organization that can once again take wages and working conditions out of capitalist competition.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 14 2003 - 00:00:00 EDT