(OPE-L) Re: value and labour

From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 07:50:09 EDT

Andy B wrote on Monday, May 12:

>  Michael W's recent post
> exemplifies the sort of Hegel-inspired miscomprehension of labour
> that I argue against. Michael Eldred's contributions to OPEL, where
> labour has no centrality, seem to be a connected if extreme
> development of such a position.

Hi Andy.  The above, whether you intended it or not,  reads like a
"guilt by association" claim.  Whatever Michael E's position is now
can not be legitimately read as a criticism  -- or "extreme development"
-- of Mike W's position or that of other value-form theorists.

In solidarity, Jerry

PS to Howard:  I'll check out your references in Rubin and I
hope to get back to you soon about that topic.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 13 2003 - 00:00:00 EDT