Re: (OPE-L) Re: Is value labour?

From: Paul Cockshott (wpc@DCS.GLA.AC.UK)
Date: Thu May 08 2003 - 09:59:28 EDT

gerald_a_levy wrote:

> Paul C wrote on Thursday, in reply to Michael E: > I think you are justified in calling attention to the use of the
> > term 'forms' in idealist metaphysics.  I prefer to use
> > terms like 'mode of representation' of value instead
> > of 'value form'. For the purpose of the following question, let's call itexchange-value rather than value-form: What is the difference
> conceptually between 'mode ofrepresentation'  and 'form of appearance'? In solidarity, Jerry

The absence of a subject in the former.

Paul Cockshott
Dept Computing Science
University of Glasgow

0141 330 3125

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 09 2003 - 00:00:00 EDT