gerald_a_levy wrote: > Re Paul C's [6946-7]: > > In , Paul wrote: > > > One may speculate whether on a multiplicity of worlds, spread accross > > the universe, on which intelligent life develops capitalism would usually > > develop without first being enmeshed in slavery. But this can only be > > speculation, we can never test it. > > Then, in  Paul constructs what he recognizes to be a hypothetical > commodity-producing slave mode of production. > > Yet, in constructing in  his "generalized commodity producing slave > economy" Paul has engaged in precisely the type of speculation that he > warned Nicky about in . Or, even worse, since Paul constructs a > hypothetical mode of production whereas capitalism -- even when it does > not appear in specific social formations in 'pure' form -- is a product of > history > and a reality. Here I would beg to differ. My generalised commodity producing slavery was not intended as a completely hypothetical system. It bears the same sort of relationship to the early Roman empire as Marx's reproduction schemes do to the early British Empire. In both cases they are simplified and idealised models of how actual societies operate. Such models give us the major dynamic of the society by concentrating on the form of economy on which the dominant section of the ruling class depends.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 02 2002 - 00:00:09 EDT