[OPE-L:4826] RE: Re: RE: Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates)

From: P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 04:23:30 EST


Glad to hear that we are in agreement as I had supposed.

I have yet to catch up with David's article, so thanks for the reminder: I'm
putting it on my to do list.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari [mailto:rakeshb@Stanford.EDU]
>Sent: 02 February 2001 08:36
>To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu
>Subject: [OPE-L:4824] Re: RE: Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates)
>re 4822
>>As far as I can see, Rakesh's final sentence is in accord with my
>>interpretation of Marx, but Rakesh seems to have taken my 
>original post to
>>imply that I disagree with him about this.
>>Are we talking at cross-purposes somehow?
>I think we are indeed in broad agreement. I am wondering what you 
>make of David Laibman's criticism of the sequential approach on pp. 
>318-19 Science and Society, 64, 3 (Fall 2000). I really don't 
>understand his charge of institutionalism.  Is  it clear to you?
>All the best, Rakesh

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:38 EST