[OPE-L:4570] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: transformation

From: Allin Cottrell (cottrell@wfu.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 24 2000 - 20:16:55 EST

On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari wrote:

> You said that surplus value, defined as total value minus the value
> of the inputs, would not be equal to the sum of profits in the final
> modified scheme.
> I then showed that your definition of surplus value could not be
> Marx's for it leads to an adding up theory of price.

This is paradoxical.  How can a definition on which surplus
value is explicitly a residual lead to an "adding up" theory?

Allin C.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:05 EST