On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > Rakesh wrote in [OPE-L:4464]: > > > Though a neo Ricardian, Allin does not understand this basic > > difference between determination and resolution in Marx. > > How are you using this expression "Neo-Ricardian" here? I > suspect that Allin would not agree that he is a > "Neo-Ricardian", i.e. that he is an advocate of a "surplus > approach" perspective. Thanks, Jerry. True enough: I don't mind the label "Ricardian" in some respects, but I'm not a Neo-Ricardian. Allin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EST