[OPE-L:4273] Re: Steve on the worthlessness of labor at the source of surplus value

From: Allin Cottrell (cottrell@wfu.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 23:16:57 EDT

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Alejandro Ramos wrote:

> The other thing I find striking is that the general mood in
> most of Marxist economists is consider *in advance* that
> Marx is essentially wrong and must be "corrected" (Why? This
> is unclear. If he's wrong shouldn't be "corrected" but
> directly surpassed.) Simetrically, the work of authors such
> as Bohm Bawerk is considered *in advance* *right*, *sound*.

I'm not sure who you're thinking of here, Alejandro.  
Personally, I think Marx was basically right while Bohm-Bawerk
is basically rubbish.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EST