[ show plain text ]
Michael P wrote in [OPE-L:3836]:
> The transformation problem [in the form of an
> algebraic solution] does not make sense.
What are you saying the problem is here? Is it:
a) the idea that the transformation can be expressed algebraicly?
b) the assumptions re fixed capital concerning the transformation?
c) neither of the above?
d) both of the above?
In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 00:00:05 EDT