[OPE-L:3577] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: money-capital as initial givens

From: Fred B. Moseley (fmoseley@mtholyoke.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 10 2000 - 10:26:11 EDT

[ show plain text ]

Hi Gil,

Thanks for your request. Attached to this message are three papers in
which I discuss Marx's key premiss of the prior determination of the
total amount of surplus-value for the economy as a whole. I would of
course be very interested in your comments.

I look forward to resuming our discussion later in the summer.


On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Gil Skillman wrote:

> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:14:55 -0400
> From: Gil Skillman <gskillman@mail.wesleyan.edu>
> Reply-To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu
> To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu
> Subject: [OPE-L:3574] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: money-capital as initial givens
> Fred, I don't really understand this point. I know you're busy now, but
> could you direct me to a particular paper in which you develop this
> argument? Thanks, Gil
> >There is no contradiction between equations (2) and (4) if equation (2) is
> >understood to apply to the economy as a whole (i.e. to capital in
> >general), as I have argued in several papers. Equation (2) (or an
> >equation similar to it in my papers) determines the total amount of
> >surplus-value and the rate of profit, which then is taken as given in
> >the determination of individual prices of production in equation (4).
> >
> >Comradely,
> >Fred
> >
> >

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 31 2000 - 00:00:04 EDT