[OPE-L:3355] Re: Re: Critique

From: Paul Cockshott (clyder@gn.apc.org)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 18:57:35 EDT

[ show plain text ]

At 16:57 25/05/00 GMT, glevy@acnet.pratt.edu wrote:
>a) The struggle is for a self-determining society, a society characterised
>by a fluidity of social relations.
  why should the class struggle lead to this?

>b) Struggle now is pre-figurative: the form of struggle is related to the
>goal of a self-determining society. Struggle is directed against

whose struggle?

>d) Theory is an integral part of struggle. Theory must be directed against
>the definition which is the conceptual counterpart of the rigidification of
>social relations.

Why should it?

Paul Cockshott (clyder@gn.apc.org)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:12 EDT