[ show plain text ]
A response to Paul Z [OPE-L:2880]:
>It is academics like you, Paul, who seem
most reluctant to delve into philosophical background materials! I find
>>Strange formulation, almost ad hominem: On the one hand, most on this
list are academics with varying opinions on Hegel. On the other hand, if
I am to be a certain type of "academic", what type would it be, given that
we haven't met and are unlikely to know each other's political practice?
I'm sorry Paul. My response to you was completely uncalled for. I was
annoyed with you for what I took to be your 'dismissive' attitude.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:44 EDT