[ show plain text ]
May I say that I am 100 0n agreement with Allin?
At 0:01 +0100 13-04-2000, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>I'm tempted to second some of Riccardo's points.
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Gerald Levy wrote:
>> What specific concepts in Keynes related to the category of
>> finance have not been appreciated by Marxists (or
>> anticipated by Marx)?
>The idea that with a non-commodity money, the financing of
>investment need not "wait" for the amassing of funds via saving
>out of income, but can logically precede the saving that
>necessarily matches investment via the GDP accounting
>> > (ii) the notion of 'liquidity preference';
>> Perhaps. Explain further.
>The idea that the interest rate is not merely a reflection of
>the rate of profit, but can be driven independently by the
>actions of speculators (or by central bank policy), in which
>case the rate of profit may become the dog that is wagged by the
>> > (iv) the priority of investment over saving;
>> Or do you mean consumption over saving since investment
>> demand is viewed as a derived demand in Keynesian theory,
>> isn't it?
>No fair. Ultimately, says Keynes (echoing Smith), investment
>demand is derived from expectation of future consumption demand,
>but in the current period investment is in the driving seat.
>> I find it curious that you didn't mention the multiplier or the
>The accelerator is Harrod et al., not Keynes.
Office: Department of Economics
Piazza Rosate, 2
I-24129 Bergamo, Italy
Home: Via Massena, 51
I-10128 Torino, Italy
e-mail email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
tel: +39 035 277545 (direct)
+39 035 277501 (dept. secr.)
+39 011 5819619 (home)
fax: +39 035 249975
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:44 EDT