[ show plain text ]
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, John Ernst wrote:
> On the macro level, the idea is to create an economy in
> which only Dept. I exists.
But isn't this incoherent, other than as a sort of "bubble"
which must burst sooner or later?
My reaction: Why, "incoherent" ? Granted the idea is
absurd but it does follow from the concept of production for
profit or M-C-M'. Any consumption by any individual slows
the accumulation process. How and why the bubble must burst
is not immediately obvious.
(Cf. Kalecki's comment on what to do if a railway between A and
B is suffering a lack of custom: use it to build another one
between the two places.)
My comment: Why not initially build between A and B so that a
larger and faster one can be built between A and B and so on?
In capitalism, productive consumption is the rule, not the
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:43 EDT