[ show plain text ]
Yikes, Paul Z wrote:
>Another implication is that we must develop the theory of "modes of
>production" (slavery, feudal, capitalist, etc.) BEFORE we get too hung up
>about "transitions" between modes of production.
This implies that a conception of the Law of Social Revolution, i.e., the
transition from one mode of production to another, is somehow incidental to
his theory. Just put a stake in the old man, why don't you!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:43 EDT