[ show plain text ]
But a slave working with the same technology and under the same conditions
must add the same value to the product as a wage worker, don't you think?
>Alfredo raised the question:
>Q): What is the difference, for Marx, between:
>(a) a machine
>(b) an animal
>(c) a slave
>(d) a wage worker
>supposing that all of them are employed by capital in the production of
>commodities? *Why* does each of them does/does not add value to
>A): The questions are already replied by Marx, I think.
>1. (a), (b) & (c) are fixed capitals but (d) is a variable capital.
>2. (c) does not add value but (d) does because (c) is not the kind of
>abstract labor in that the free versatility of labor is not adapted by the
Duncan K. Foley
Department of Economics
New School University
65 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 09:47:58 EDT