[ show plain text ]
> But this isn't the sort of thing that I, or the 19th-century
>debaters, had in mind: rather, such "facts" as that the annual average
>number of murders or suicides in a particular jurisdiction was normally
>distributed about a stable mean.
> It not unreasonably occurred to those working with social statistics
>to wonder what this implied about the sources of human behaviour.
> Since murder -- and especially self-murder (as many thought of it in
>those days) seem on the face of it the most extreme outcomes of human will
>and intentionality, one might expect the annual rates of these to be very
>erratic, whereas they are (or were) apparently rather regularly distributed.
> Quetelet was an outright statistical fatalist: he fully believed
>that the regularities which he discovered implied that the agents were under
>compulsion to carry out the acts involved: "society prepares the crimes", he
>said. Thus he argued that responsibility and punishment were inappropriate
>categories in this connection.
Marx also; see his article in NYDT jan 28 1853, MECW 11 495
P. S. Please note that I have a new Email address,
but the old one will also run until next summer. (To be doubly sure load both!)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 07:00:08 EST